Lecture # 2

The Dolls Live On: Eshu and Ibeji in Salvador Orisha Worship

I attended this lecture that was part of the symposium Yoruba Art: Continuity and Change.  The lecturer was John Mason, who is the director of Yoruba Theological Archministry.  In his lecture Mason explains growing up with these dolls while also explaining their background.  Mason grew up in Cuba with his mother and father who were both blind.  His mother made Eshu and Ibeji dolls, and because she could not see he occasionally had to help her with the finishing touches.  After explaining his background with these dolls, he discussed the process from which the dolls evolved.  To understand this process though he first had to explain how many women in Yoruba culture tend to have twins, but instead of viewing this as a miracle the women are shunned from society and their babies are discarded in the forest to die.  Often times the babies are put on the base of ‘sacred’ trees.  It is here that the process begins: the sacred tree, according to Mason, is the first doll.  From there the dolls can embody many different spirits.  Some of the dolls are seen wearing bands around their ankles. This is not just on dolls though, children and priests and priestess’s wear them too, to “keep them from flying away.”  Wearing these bands makes noise each time when the person walks, thus scaring away death. I found this lecture very interesting.  I have seen some of these dolls before but I didn’t know what they were supposed to represent, nor did I know anything about their background.  

Thursday Posting: Terror-proof buildings

Repellent

“Attempting to design a terror-proof building is the epitome of arrogance, a sense of hubris that deliberately ignores the boundaries of the human mind. We do this at our own peril by underestimating our enemies,” says Raymond T. Mellon, partner at a NY construction law firm.

Geoghegan, Tom and Casciani, Dominic.  “How to terror-proof shopping centres and other buildings.  BBC News.  15 Nov. 2007.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7095884.stm

In this article Geoghegan and Casciani discuss the UK’s desire to terror proof public buildings after the attacks on Glasgow airport and car bombings in the West End of London.  The article is divided by categories of buildings.  The authors go into depth about plans of terror-proofing airports, sporting venues, railway stations, shopping centers and nightclubs, and of course key political buildings.  Although these different buildings all require unique protection, the concepts behind protecting them from terrorists remain the same.  After learning that terrorists were planning on poisoning beer and burgers at football games, the Arsenal Football Club’s Emirates Stadium in north London designed their new building with security as their top priority.  Geoghegan and Casciani state in the article: “Emirates' strength, say officials, is that it has limited access to vehicles. The stadium's apron is ringed with subtle obstacles that would prevent a car bomb from getting near. Concrete planters and benches are deliberately placed to prevent a car weaving through them to reach the stadium itself.  Giant cannons, part of the club's insignia, can stop a moving vehicle. The architects placed the club's name in dramatic giant lettering at a critical access point. Those letters are not just there for aesthetic effect - they could stop a seven-tonne lorry.” 

After reading about the security of all the different types of buildings, there are definitely similar concepts used to strengthen security.  Using barriers to reduce car access close to the buildings, using non-fragmenting materials to reduce shrapnel in the case of an explosion, and having security screening outside of the building to have a better opportunity of identifying a security risk without compromising the security of the buildings.  Not everyone is so sure about the idea of terror-proofing buildings.  According to the article, “Austin Williams of the National Building Specification believes it is contributing to the "death of architecture" because aesthetics are being sacrificed for the sake of precaution. Public buildings, he says, are becoming "fear of public" buildings.”

This article was very interesting to me in light of recently studying different types of architecture.  While I was aware that post 9/11 buildings are being designed to withstand terrorist attacks, I didn’t realize the scale on which this is being done.  Its not just skyscrapers that are being terror-proofed, its everything from shopping malls and grocery stores to airports and stadiums.  The subtle placement of planters and benches as a way of strengthening security really intrigues me, and I think I can incorporate this theory into my images. 

Monday Post: Loretta Lux

Lux was born in 1969 in Dresden, Germany.  In 1990 she graduated from the Academy of Visual Arts in Munich, with a major in painting.  Her big debut came in 2004 at the Yossi Milo Gallery in New York.  According to Wikipedia, “The show put both Yossi Milo and Loretta Lux on the map, selling out and setting new prices never before seen from a new gallery.”  Lux is well known for her photographs of young children, which combine painting and digital manipulation.  Her photographs are manipulated in such a way that the children seem ghostly and disturbing, too large for their surroundings or too surreal.  Lux says about the children in her work, “I never allow then to wear their own clothes.  My work isn’t about these children.  You can recognize them, but they are alienated from their real appearance” (arts telegraph.co.uk).  Using Photoshop she manipulates the color of their skin and the scale of their bodies, making the viewer realize all at once that something is unnatural about these children. 

 

Artist’s website:

http://www.lorettalux.de/

 

Gallery representing artist:

http://www.yossimilo.com/artists/lore_lux/

 

Interview with the artist:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3638552/'I-use-children-as-a-metaphor-for-a-lost-paradise'.html